There is an even simpler option, however, for those investors who want to quickly turn a small profit on a property, but who do not want to sink all of their capital into making the property acceptable (or risk failure to sale). Consider making use of the assignment of contract, which essentially allows the investor to select a property and negotiate the terms of the sale, but then hand over the sale to a third-party buyer without ever actually purchasing the property. In other words, the investor does the legwork and the negotiating, but he never spends a dime (on purchase or any repairs) and never actually owns the property—which is great in the event of a contingency.
The only things that are really required to do this successfully (aside from the knowledge) are the organizational and management skills that are necessary to simultaneously set up and negotiate deals with a seller and a buyer. For example, you set up the purchase of a small retail business location for $110,000; at the same time, you find a buyer who’s interested in that property for $120,000. When flipping a property, you own the property—that means you can sell it for whatever you want. However, when assigning a contract, it is important that the buyer knows the property only costs $110,000, but that he is being assigned a $10,000 assignment of contract fee in order to assume ownership of the transaction (the value of the fee is up to you, the investor). You may ask yourself, “If the buyer knows the property only costs $110,000, then why doesn’t he just go to the seller with that price?” The answer is, simply, he can. But the nature of this process dictates that you have already set up the terms of the deal with the seller, who will be less inclined to start new negotiations with an unknown buyer. If all else fails and a buyer tries to beat you to the punch, then you can simply purchase and flip the property as usual.
But when the opportunity is available—when a seller and buyer are simultaneously lined up to do business with you at the right prices—then you must know how to make use of the assignment of contract. If your intention is to purchase and quickly sell the property for profit (and never effectively own the property), then why not make that the legal case? If you never own the property, but still stand to make all the profit, then there is no risk to you in the event that something doesn’t work out (which is highly likely in a transaction involving at least three distinct parties). You are more of a middleman, a matchmaker, than an investor. And this is a highly profitable and risk-free way of doing business.
Tell us what you think by leaving a comment. If you would like to be notified when new posts are made to this site, be sure to subscribe to the RSS feed.
http://www.indianainvestmentpropertygroup.com
http://www.practicallyfreehouses.com
Based out of Indiana, Jay Redding is a real estate entrepreneur, consultant and educator with experience in residential and commercial investing.


